Senate shj
  • Story
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Perspectives
  • Contact us
  • Work with us
  • AU
  • NZ
Senate shj
  • Story
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Perspectives
  • Work with us
  • Contact us

Game, set and match for Djokovic

Perspectives
SenateSHJ > Perspectives » Game, set and match for Djokovic

The Hon Alex Hawke MP, Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs, cancelled Novak Djokovic’s visa late on Friday 14 January on health and good order grounds saying it was in the public interest to do so.

But what can Djokovic’s role in this teach us about reputation?  

Reputation takes a long time to build. It’s predicated on a perceived authenticity around a core purpose which is judged according to deeds and actions aligned with that purpose.

The key is knowing who you are and being seen to stick with it. This match-up saw breaks of that all-important emotional bond with stakeholders.

Over the course of this mismatch, some first supported Djokovic, then switched, switched again and ended up supporting one or the other side, or neither.  Some supported one side and stuck to their guns all the way through.

Irrespective, the biggest reputation issue was consistency of narrative, and in this respect the waters were well and truly muddied. Many argued that Djokovic downright mislead everyone.

At the heart of reputation lies trust. And for many ‘the Joker’ broke this.

Now we know the outcome, there are some lessons for Djokovic in four tried and trusted reputation management principles to rebuild tarnished reputations.

First, do what you say you will do. Don’t say one thing – and do something else or see something contrary emerge.

Second, be prepared to sincerely acknowledge faults and take the blame for where you went wrong. No-one can build or keep a good reputation or be seen to trustworthy or credible by failing to admit errors.

It can be argued the Djokovic was trying to do this in his admission that he undertook an interview and travelled after testing positive for COVID-19 and filling out his immigration form incorrectly. The question, however, was one of sincerity.

Third, understand you’ll never please everyone. So, acknowledge the different perspectives.

Finally, be transparent, authentic and act with integrity.

There was plenty of double faulting in this five-setter, and some significant reputation hits all of which will take some time to rebuild.

This story was shared by

8517b

Craig Badings

Partner Sydney +61 413 946 703 [email protected]

More perspectives

The legal and reputational risks and rewards of social media Read more
Together forever? Not while governments snipe about COVID Read more

Find similar stories

Government Reputation

Share this story

Looking for a new Perspective?
Sign up to our newsletter here.
Join the conversation Follow us on Twitter AUAU Follow us on Twitter NZNZ Follow us on LinkedIn

Subscribe

* All fields are required
Loading

Thanks for subscribing!

We've sent you an email to confirm your details.

Want to change your preferences?

You're already subscribed! Please get in touch at [email protected] if you have a query.

Oops, something went wrong, please try again. Let us know at [email protected] if you have an issue

Our story

  • Awards
  • Network

People

  • SenateSHJ team
  • Australia

Expertise

  • Reputation
  • Engagement
  • Change
  • Government
  • Financial
  • Digital
  • Capability
  • ESG and Sustainability
  • Insights

Sectors

  • Corporate
  • Public sector
  • Energy
  • Health
  • Resources

Perspectives

  • Crisis Index
  • The Togetherness Index
  • Four Rooms of Change®
  • The Missed Foundation
  • All stories

SenateSHJ

  • Find us
  • Work with us
  • Privacy Policy
Senate SHJ

Senate Communications Ltd and Scaffidi Hugh-Jones Pty Ltd (ACN 126 085 952) are two separate companies trading as SenateSHJ.

© SenateSHJ 2025